vibedonaldsvibedonalds.com

Codex vs OpenHands: How They Actually Differ

Pick Codex if you want a managed coding agent on OpenAI's GPT models, with work continuing across CLI, IDE, and GitHub, and a free tier included with ChatGPT. Pick OpenHands if you want an MIT-licensed, self-hostable agent you can point at any major LLM with your own key.

Compiled 2026-08-31 from our catalogue entries for Codex and OpenHands.

The short answer

Pick Codex if
you want a managed agent that runs the same workflow across terminal, IDE, desktop, and cloud, reviews GitHub pull requests, and is included with ChatGPT plans down to a free tier.
Pick OpenHands if
you want an open-source, Docker-hosted agent that accepts any major LLM via your own API key, and you are comfortable running the infrastructure yourself.
Cheapest way in
Codex has a published Free plan at $0/month; OpenHands' starting price is not recorded and no verified plans are on file for it.
What we could not compare
OpenHands pricing, hosted-tier feature limits versus Codex's cloud tier, whether Codex can be self-hosted (not mentioned in our file), and any OpenHands GitHub PR-review capability (not mentioned).

Both Codex and OpenHands sit in the AI Coding Agents category and are sold as freemium products with command-line support on Windows, macOS, and Linux. Beyond that overlap, they take opposite bets on how a coding agent should be delivered.

Codex is a managed, closed tool from OpenAI that runs on GPT models and is available across the terminal, an IDE extension, a desktop app, and a cloud environment, with a GitHub pull-request review built in. OpenHands is an MIT-licensed platform you self-host in Docker; it is model-agnostic by design, since you supply your own API key for any major LLM, and it exposes a sandboxed browser, file editor, and terminal to the agent.

Side by side

Every cell is a field on our catalogue entry for that tool, copied as recorded. Rows where the two differ come first; blank fields say so rather than being filled in.

 CodexOpenHands
Starts atFree — $0 /monthNot recorded
Runs onweb, mac, win, linux, cli, vscode-extweb, mac, win, linux, cli
Public source codeNo public repo listedYes — public repo
CategoryAI Coding AgentsAI Coding Agents
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Public docsNot listedNot listed
  • Public source code: From the repository link on each catalogue entry, not a licence audit.

Where Codex is the better fit

  • One agent that runs across CLI, IDE, desktop, and cloud, so work moves between surfaces.
  • Cloud code review on GitHub pull requests that comments inline and proposes fixes.
  • Reads the shared AGENTS.md standard, supports MCP tools, and is included with ChatGPT plans from the free tier up through Pro.

Full Codex entry · Codex pricing, verified

Where OpenHands is the better fit

  • MIT-licensed and self-hostable in Docker, with a public repo under All-Hands-AI/OpenHands.
  • Bring-your-own-key for any major LLM provider, so the agent is not tied to one vendor.
  • Sandboxed runtime that exposes a browser, file editor, and terminal to the agent.

Full OpenHands entry

Which one should you pick?

Solo developer who wants to stay in their editor and ship code with a free starting plan
Codex

It runs in terminal, IDE, and desktop, includes a $0/month tier, and is bundled with ChatGPT plans up through Pro.

Small team that wants to self-host the agent on its own infrastructure and pick the model
OpenHands

It is MIT-licensed and Docker-hosted with BYO key support for any major LLM, which keeps vendor lock-in out of the stack.

Team that reviews GitHub pull requests daily and wants an inline commenting agent
Codex

A cloud code review on pull requests that proposes fixes is listed as a strength; OpenHands' file does not mention GitHub PR review.

Tinkerer with Docker skills who wants an open autonomous-agent loop without a managed subscription
OpenHands

Self-hostable in Docker with any major LLM via your own key, trading managed convenience for openness.

Frequently asked questions

Can Codex use non-OpenAI models like Claude or Gemini?
No. Codex is listed as locked to OpenAI's GPT models, with no Claude or Gemini support out of the box.
Can I self-host Codex?
Our file does not mention a self-hosting option for Codex. OpenHands, by contrast, is explicitly self-hostable in Docker.
Does OpenHands cost anything?
Pricing is described as freemium, but the starting price is not recorded and no verified plans are on file.
Does either tool review GitHub pull requests?
Codex is listed as having cloud code review on pull requests that comments inline and proposes fixes. OpenHands' file does not mention GitHub PR review.
Do both work in the terminal?
Yes. Both list cli among their supported platforms.

What we compared

This page states nothing that is not in the two catalogue entries below. The exact text used to write it is reproduced here so you can check our reading, and both tools link through to their own pages and to the vendor.

Show the source text
## Codex (/tools/codex)
Tagline: OpenAI's coding agent — works in the terminal, IDE, and cloud, reviews GitHub pull requests, and runs on GPT-5 models.
Category: AI Coding Agents
Pricing model: freemium
Starts at: Free — $0 /month
Platforms: web, mac, win, linux, cli, vscode-ext
Public repo: none listed
Docs: none listed
Verified plans (read 2026-08-21): Free $0 /month | Go $8 /month | Plus $20 /month | Pro 5x $100 /month | Pro 20x $200 /month | Business / Enterprise Not published | API Key Pay only for the tokens Codex uses, based on API pricing
Strengths on file: Runs one agent across CLI, IDE, desktop, and cloud — work moves between surfaces.; Strong GitHub integration: a cloud code review on a pull request that catches real bugs and proposes fixes.; Reads the shared AGENTS.md standard and supports MCP tools.; Included with ChatGPT plans, from the free tier up through Pro.
Limits on file: Locked to OpenAI's GPT models — no Claude or Gemini out of the box.; Fewer built-in customization primitives (hooks, sub-agents) than some rivals.
Codex is OpenAI's agentic coding tool. It runs the same agent across a terminal CLI, an IDE extension, a desktop app, and a cloud environment, so work started in one surface can continue in another. It reads the shared AGENTS.md instructions file, speaks the Model Context Protocol (MCP), and can spin up a cloud code review on a GitHub pull request that comments inline and proposes fixes. Codex runs on OpenAI's GPT models — currently GPT-5.5 as the recommended frontier model — and is included with ChatGPT plans, from the free tier up through Pro.

## OpenHands (/tools/openhands)
Tagline: Open-source autonomous coding agent platform, formerly OpenDevin, by All Hands AI.
Category: AI Coding Agents
Pricing model: freemium
Starts at: Not recorded
Platforms: web, mac, win, linux, cli
Public repo: https://github.com/All-Hands-AI/OpenHands
Docs: none listed
Verified plans: none on file
Strengths on file: MIT-licensed and fully self-hostable in Docker.; Bring-your-own-key for any major LLM provider.; Sandboxed runtime with browser, file editor, and terminal exposed to the agent.
Limits on file: Self-hosting requires Docker familiarity and a powerful machine.; Hosted SaaS tier still feature-limited compared to commercial agents like Devin.
OpenHands is an open-source autonomous coding-agent platform from All Hands AI — formerly OpenDevin.
Its edge is an open, self-hostable take on the autonomous agent: MIT-licensed and self-hostable in Docker, bring-your-own-key for any major LLM, and a sandboxed runtime that exposes a browser, file editor, and terminal to the agent.
It's for teams who want Devin-style autonomy without the lock-in and are willing to run it themselves. Caveats: self-hosting needs Docker familiarity and a capable machine, and the hosted SaaS tier is still feature-limited compared with commercial agents like Devin.
It's the open, self-hostable counterpart to the managed, closed Devin.

Change log

  • 2026-08-31 First published, compiled from the catalogue entries for Codex and OpenHands.